Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Plaintiffs: Hot Dogs Are Like Cigarettes
Three New Jersey residents plan to file a lawsuit today that could put the staple of the great American backyard cookout-the hot dog-on the same path as the once romanticized puff on a cigarette. Pointing to "landmark" research showing a heightened risk of colon cancer in people who consume processed meat, the class-action lawsuit in state Superior Court in Newark will target the makers of Nathan's, Oscar Mayer, Ball Park, Hebrew National and Sabrett franks as if they were Big Tobacco. The plaintiffs want labels on hot dogs to read, "WARNING: CONSUMING HOT DOGS AND OTHER PROCESSED MEATS INCREASES THE RISK OF CANCER." Read full Star Ledger report here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
There goes the famous Coney Island Hot Dog Eating contest...
Liberalism is a mental disorder
Throw this case out!!
Any stupid jury who gives in to this should not be picked for jury duty.
I think I'll sue for breathing the air here. It's making me sick.
Hope they don't ban the dog that might mean parlor meetings without fran n blanks
The people bringing this lawsuit are missing one small detail in their comparison of processed meat to tobacco - namely that processed meat does not contain an addictive substance such as nicotine.
In other words, once you start smoking, it can be very difficult to stop. No such case exists with hot dogs.
The Wolf
Smoking also affects those around you, so you are inflicting others with secondary smoke. You don't hurt by standers by eating hot dogs. Hot dogs are not addictive and consuming in moderation is no worse than drinking soda (in moderation) or eating all the other junk out there, too numerous to mention. We don't need food police.
What is next Cholent and Kishka?
Eat right, stay fit, die anyway.
Post a Comment